Showing posts with label online movie journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label online movie journalism. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Star Wars Films Will Keep Getting Axed, Here's Why

  I haven’t done one of these “think pieces” in awhile, so I’m gonna start with a list:

Star Wars movies either canceled or in limbo:

Obi-Wan Kenobi (reworked as a show)

Boba Fett (reworked as a show)

Rian Johnson Trilogy

Benioff & Weiss Trilogy

Knights of the Old Republic

Kevin Feige Movie

Rogue Squadron

A Droid Story

Lando

Taika Waititi Movie

Damon Lindelof Movie


That’s fifteen movies. Quite a bit, eh? So now the question becomes: Why does this keep happening, and will it ever get better?


I can already answer the second part of the question: No.


But to understand why, we need to dissect the first part of the question…


Back in 1972, George Lucas began working on what would eventually become Star Wars. The movie came out in 1977. That means he had five entire years to work on the movie soup-to-nuts, without having to worry about fan expectations because, surprise, there were no fans yet…


Thankfully, the film received immediate universal praise. The following film, The Empire Strikes Back, was met with some initial criticism, but people quickly came around to it. Since then, each installment has been divisive, at best. Things became even more complex in 2012, when Disney acquired the property. Now, the franchise had to try to please both fans AND shareholders alike. Spoiler alert: both camps want as much content as possible, even if they don’t admit it…


To make matters worse, Disney launched its own streaming service in 2019, just as the mainline Skywalker Saga was coming to end. Similarly to Marvel, Star Wars now had to define a new, post-saga course for its movies, while also justifying the existence of multiple shows a year, all while still having to appeal to both fans and shareholders alike…


Therefore, as one would expect, Lucasfilm is under pressure to keep announcing content on a regular basis. Some of you reading this may go “they should at least write an outline before announcing something.” While I’m not on the inside, I can all but guarantee that every new movie they announce has at least an outline before they announce it. That said, a good outline doesn’t necessarily guarantee a good script, let alone a good movie. Speaking as a writer myself, I can’t even begin to tell you how many times I’ve written an outline, thinking I have a hit on my hands, only to then start expanding said outline into an actual manuscript and realizing what I had was actually shit. In fact, it just happened to me again today…


So now you may be thinking “okay, well then they should write at least one full script draft before they announce something.” I think it’s pretty safe to say that, if it weren’t for having to keep the shareholders happy, that’s exactly what they would do. In fact, they even tried that a few times, but the problem is that scripts take quite a bit of time to write, and when it comes to Star Wars, it’s hard to keep things a secret, especially from scoop-hungry journalists. Keep in mind that the Kevin Feige movie was never officially announced by Disney or Lucasfilm themselves. They were secretly working on the script, and then someone on the inside talked to a journalist, and the rest is history. Same thing happened to the Damon Lindelof film.


This is all to say that, a lot of times, a project is either forced into announcement prematurely by the major studio (Disney, in this case), or its existence is leaked to the press while it’s still in the scripting phase. This even happens to small, non-IP projects that never get finished, let alone something like Star Wars…


Even Marvel’s beloved Infinity Saga hit some bumps in the road along the way (some entries were better than others, plus, remember when Inhumans was supposed to be a movie?). And while the Multiverse Saga continues to chug along, its reception seems to keep declining with each and every new release, and their plans are slowly becoming more “wobbly” now too (remember when Armor Wars was supposed to be a show? Is Kang still gonna be the new final boss?). I’ve also said this before, but even the Infinity Saga itself didn’t become “solidified” until the first Avengers film in 2012 (they didn’t know they were gonna pursue the Thanos story until then, hence why the cartoony-looking gauntlet full of stones in the first Thor film had to be retconned as a decoy).


Besides, do you think the people running Star Wars want to keep putting out multiple mediocre movies every year, like Marvel does right now? Especially when Star Wars seems to receive ten times as much scrutiny? As a matter of fact, no other franchise outside of Marvel has managed to pull off the assembly-line model that they themselves pioneered, and can barely still do themselves. I can’t even count on two hands how many abandoned film slates DC has had in the last decade, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the whole James Gunn thing doesn’t work out now either…


With that all being said, I think it’s time for all of us to accept that the Infinity Saga was a fluke, and that a pre-determined, decade-long film slate like that is never gonna happen ever again. When it comes to any franchise, movies are gonna keep getting announced because shareholders (as well as fans, to a lesser extent) want to keep knowing what’s going on. Some of those plans will happen, some of them won’t. It is what it is. In fact, we now live in a world where an entire movie can be filmed and yet still be canceled (RIP Batgirl). My best advice would be to just not take any of this stuff too seriously until you see a trailer for it…


I’d like to also remind everyone that good art usually takes time. It took Tolkien seventeen years to finally publish all three volumes of The Lord of the Rings, after all. I also think that the days of something getting announced and then being released just a few years later are over. Like I said at the start of this post, Lucas took five whole years to make the original film. Similarly, he announced The Phantom Menace in 1993, and the movie itself only came out six entire years later. On another similar note, the original Spider-Man movie was in development hell for like ten years and went through a few different directors (even James Cameron was supposed to do it, at one point). Terminator 2 and Aliens both took seven years to make (both by Cameron too, funny enough). Pixar sequels take a while too. The list goes on…


People these days expect a slate announcement for everything when, not that long ago, there were no slate announcements for franchises cause franchises as we know them now didn’t even exist yet. For a long time, there was no internet/ social media to even use for such announcements. Everything just got reported through trade magazines like Variety and whatnot. Also, up until 2008, superhero movies did not connect together to form cinematic universes, and other series like Star Wars, Harry Potter, Middle-Earth, etc. were nowhere near ready to think about spin-offs and whatnot. Furthermore, Marvel head Kevin Feige even said recently that, going forward, Marvel itself “will operate more like a normal development studio, so don’t expect every project that gets reported on to actually get made” (I’m paraphrasing there). Even he’s getting tired of these big slate announcements, cause they’re starting to backfire on him (remember when the Blade reboot movie was announced in 2019?).


I say all this because I’ve noticed movie nerds getting more and more anxious about this stuff. A few months ago, it was announced that the sequel to The Batman would only be released in late 2026 (four and a half years after the first one), and a bunch of people online threw a temper tantrum over it (EDIT: Delayed to 2028 now, which is more warranted of criticism). Unfortunately, it seems that Marvel (and major studio culture in general) has conditioned everyone into thinking that we always need content within a few years from announcement. We need to get out of that mindset, I think…


If it’s any consolation, I’m sure all the in-limbo Star Wars projects listed at the top here will eventually get made. Some might mutate into shows (like Kenobi and Fett did). Some might change directors still. Some might only get released like ten or so years after they were originally announced. This was the world before Marvel, and it’s the world again now…


Peace!


UPDATE: I’m not saying that all future Marvel films will suck, nor am I saying that Star Wars shouldn’t start doing multiple movies a year like Marvel does. I’m not in a position to say what any of these brands should or shouldn’t do. Maybe all Marvel movies from here on out will be great. Maybe Star Wars will start doing multiple films a year and be able to do it just as well as Marvel does. Both of those cases would be nice, actually…

Friday, November 3, 2023

Ranking the DCEU Based On First Impressions

        Not gonna even bother with an intro for this one:


Loved it

1.Peacemaker Season 1

2.Wonder Woman

3.The Suicide Squad

4.Shazam!


I liked it but didn’t love it

5.Justice League (any version)

6.The Flash

7.Aquaman


Wasn’t sure how to feel about it

8.Birds of Prey

9.Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice (any version)

10.Man of Steel (third act was too much)


Didn’t like it

11.Suicide Squad (either version)

12.Wonder Woman 1984


Didn’t watch it

13.Blue Beetle

14.Shazam! Fury of the Gods

15.Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom

16.Black Adam


Not sure why I haven’t watched Fury of the Gods yet, despite loving the first Shazam! film. Guess I’m just getting too tired of this franchise. I only saw The Flash out of morbid curiosity from all the behind-the-scenes drama, anyways…


Welp, that’s all, folks!


Peace!


Related: Ranking Repository

Friday, January 13, 2023

Is Pop Culture Beyond Saving?

  There was a time, around the early 2010’s or so, when it seemed like all of us media dorks agreed on pretty much everything…

In general: We all loved the original trilogy and hated the prequel trilogy and were excited for the sequel trilogy. We all hated the Andrew Garfield movies and wanted Spider-Man to feel like a genuine kid. We all hated Zack Snyder and wanted DC to feel “lighthearted” like Marvel. We all loved the MCU. Perhaps most controversially to say; a lot of us were getting tired of the typical white guy hero and wanted some more diversity…


Now everything is fucked. Literally all the examples I typed above don’t even apply anymore, and that’s just the big stuff. You also have smaller examples like how, just few a years ago, everyone seemed to worship filmmakers like Favreau & Filoni, Benioff & Weiss, Taika Waititi, etc. Now, though? Not so much…


All of this has left two questions lingering in my mind:


1.What the fuck happened?

2.Can we ever get back to a point where we all agree on everything again?


The answer to that second question is no, but to understand why, we need to dissect the first question, uhh, first…


To put it simply; fans turning on their favorite franchises and/or creators can all be tied back to one root cause… They all overstay their welcome, but they also can’t stop, because money is money.


That’s literally it. Nothing more, nothing less. With enough time, a “counter culture” develops for any piece of media. Similarly, with enough time, a creator fumbles. The only exceptions are the people who take their time with everything, like JRR Tolkien and Cormac McCarthy. That said, not everyone can afford to be like Tolkien and McCarthy (both of whom had side jobs at universities, anyways). For most popular creators, creating is their business, and they have to keep going. Sometimes that means doubling down on familiar characters, worlds, etc., even long after those stories may have reached their natural conclusions…


As both a writer on the side and a geek, all of this has put me in a difficult position. For a long time, I based my whole identity around these fandoms. This was fine back in the early-to-mid 2010’s, cause my own opinions matched up with the general consensus in those days, but that’s no longer the case. On a similar note, as a writer, I’m starting to get closer and closer to potentially crafting sequels to my own work, which sorta goes against my point earlier about a lot of these things “overstaying their welcome.”


So, in both of these cases, what’s the solution? For being a fan of things, it’s easy; just look for other things to be a fan of. I myself am slowly moving away from stuff like Star Wars and superheroes, and instead shifting my focus towards other things like Cameron’s Avatar, Dune, etc. I suppose another route would be to try to keep finding more and more people to talk about the same things with, but I feel like even that would have a limit (despite how big these fandoms are, and how interconnected the world is now).


        For where to go as a writer, the answer is a little more complicated. I want to make sequels to my own stuff, but when will I know it’s the right time to stop? While typing this very post, I think I’ve reached an epiphany: All stories can have two endings; the happily ever after ending, and the real life ending…


Perhaps no story better exemplifies this than the 1967 film The Graduate (which itself is based on a book from 1963). In the very last shot of the movie, we see Dustin Hoffman and his girlfriend escape from her shit family on the back of a bus. Both of them are smiling. The movie could’ve just ended here… But it doesn’t. A few more seconds go by, and suddenly, their smiles morph into frowns. We can tell they’re both thinking “Crap, now what?” Sure, they’re free of Mrs. Robinson, but now they’re broke, with nowhere to go… In literally less than a minute, without any dialogue, the story goes from a happily ever after ending, to a real life ending…


Stories can either end on a high, or they can end in a way that reminds us how conflicts/resolutions are destined to repeat in cycles forever. Toy Story 3 is happily ever after. Toy Story 4 is real life. Return of the Jedi is happily ever after. The sequel trilogy is real life… That doesn’t mean stuff like Toy Story 4 and the sequel trilogy are entirely bad, mind you. They just are what they are…


This is all to say that, once you’ve done both your happily ever after ending and your real life ending, you should probably stop, unless you feel you have a really good reason not to, like if your series operates more as an anthology. But that would likely involve having a protagonist who’s really more just there to “observe” a story and interact with the real protagonist of each installment (which is how mysteries tend to work). I thought I was that kinda writer, but now I’m not so sure. I think I prefer seeing viewpoint characters go through changes…


Anyways, if you’re a movie geek or a storyteller (or both, like me), hopefully all this dribble drabble here gave you at least something to chew on…


Peace!


UPDATE 1: Something I forgot to mention earlier is that the whole “passing of the torch” thing doesn’t really work as well as it should, bar a few exceptions (Frodo Baggins, Miles Morales, etc.). Spin-offs are also generally not a good idea (again, bar a few exceptions like Solo). I think it may be best to just stick with one main protagonist throughout a series. Either that or maybe stop after a generation (25 years at most) of telling a certain story.


UPDATE 2: Another epiphany I just had is that people in pop culture fandoms tend to want to discuss negativity more than positivity because, when we feel negative about something, we want think about how it could’ve been better. Conversely, when something is “good enough,” we don’t care as much. But the longer you keep something around, the more you have to justify it’s existence, which hurts its chances of continuing to be “good enough.”